We hope you enjoy reading this blog post. If you want PostHire to conduct a 90-day look back of criminal activity of your organization’s actual employees at ZERO cost to you, click here.
Security teams work diligently to lock down access control. They typically rely on badge readers, multi-factor authentication, and biometric scanners. However, here’s the uncomfortable truth: we’re still treating identity as a one-time checkpoint when it should be an ongoing verification process that responds to changing risk.
The problem isn’t the technology. It’s the assumption that identity issues are static when they are actually dynamic.
Why Static Credentials Create Security Gaps
Most secure facilities rely on a simple access check. Someone scans a badge or submits to facial recognition. The system says yes or no. Access is granted.
The problem is not the check itself. It’s when and how often that check occurs. In most organizations, identity is verified once during onboarding and then treated as permanently valid. A credential approved three weeks ago is assumed to be just as trustworthy today, tomorrow, and months from now.
That assumption breaks down quickly. What happens when that same credential is used to access a restricted server room for the first time? Or next month, when it suddenly grants access to a remote facility the employee has never visited before?
Static credentials don’t evaluate changing context. They don’t check whether access behavior has changed, whether risk has increased, or whether this situation deserves closer attention. Once you’ve proven who you are, you remain trustworthy indefinitely.
That model made sense when physical keys were the primary access tool. Keys didn’t travel digitally, couldn’t be duplicated at scale, and weren’t spoofed or shared. Today’s credentials can be used, often without the cardholder’s knowledge.
How Continuous Validation Changes the Game
Modern identity systems must account for changing risk. Lighting, image quality, pose angle, and even aging affect facial recognition. Location data reveals unusual access patterns, and other contextual data flags potential security issues.
However, authentication alone isn’t enough. Knowing who someone is in the moment doesn’t tell you whether they should still have access.
Most organizations still rely on traditional background checks that identify risk at a single point in time, usually at hiring. But risk isn’t static. People’s situations change.
An employee with clean credentials at onboarding might face criminal charges weeks later. Without continuous visibility into those changes, organizations remain uninformed until after an incident occurs.
Continuous workforce screening closes this visibility gap. Real-time alerts about arrests or charges relevant to an employee’s role allow security teams to reassess access privileges before problems escalate.
Using Behavioral Signals to Measure Prevention
Behavioral signals provide early warnings that deserve investigation. When someone accesses a system at an unusual hour or moves through a building in a pattern that doesn’t match their role, security teams should take notice.
It’s the difference between reacting to attacks and preventing exposure in the first place.
Making Real-Time Access Decisions That Adapt
Continuous evaluation allows systems to reassess trust dynamically. If behavioral signals suggest elevated risk, the system can respond immediately. Odd login times might trigger additional authentication. Access requests outside the normal scope could result in temporary restriction.
Similarly, alerts about criminal activity relevant to someone’s role should prompt immediate access review. Someone arrested for embezzlement shouldn’t retain financial system access while investigations proceed.
The Real Human Factor in Access Management
The human factor in access management isn’t about replacing people with automation. It’s about recognizing that identity isn’t static, risk isn’t fixed, and trust shouldn’t be permanent.
Continuous identity validation closes critical access risk gaps. This requires combining identity verification, behavioral risk data, and continuous integrity validation. Together, these elements create a measurable prevention strategy. Just as behavioral analytics help identify emerging threats, continuous workforce screening provides the integrity layer that static credentials cannot deliver.
What you don’t know can hurt you. PostHire ensures you do know.
Contact Peter Collins, CRO PostHire for a 90-day look back of criminal activity of your organization’s actual employees – at ZERO cost to you.
